alternative animal testing

Expermintation on animals dose not work. Scientist kill 17 to 70 million animals in the U.S. alone. Scientist should rely more on human cells bye doing slinical trials on humans. Most people such as scientist reafer to animals to help treat human diseases and treatments. Animals manley make good resourses for experimaintation "because of thier genetic make up is similar to that of a humans".
Most medicine created by animal testing usally result in the medicne to be toxic or to have deadly affects on humans. "In order to make human experimintation more accrate scientist should rely on human cells". Scientist have unfourtanly relied on theses tests for more than a thousand years.
"The toxicity testing on animals has been invaluable in helping pervent a parents worst nightmare a death of a child". Testing on animals have also been proved that some medicens that was tested on animals can be deadly to children or even adults.
Animal testing is tested on mostley rats, rabbits, mice, guinea pigs, and then the lesser numbers on dogs, monkeys an many other species. People say that stolen animals are used for animal testing. The use of animals such as rats and mice and manley the starter of diseases so the drugs created from the testing are usaly are toxic.
"The national Insitute of health in the United State's is the worlds largest funders of animal experimintation. It dispences seven billion tax doolars in grant anualy, of which five billion goes towards studies involving animals". Billions of dollors are spent on animal reasearch a year mabey even more.
Funder's of animal reaserch only know the basics of animal testing they do not read deeper. they think animals are sadatied and most are the other have to suffer for the reaserch. Animals of animal testing suffer great pain just for we can get answeres to diseases. Animals such as rats and mice are usaly the animals not sadated during testing.
The tested are usaly cramed into small cages they are locked behind bars for the reaserch. Animals may get exercise and fed bt the animals end up dying. Usally shortly after being injected with an experiment.
They burn the bodys of the dead animals the animals are great tools for us but animals feel pain. The suffrage is horrific to animals and not to humans, humans rely on animal testing more than they need to.
Animal testing has risen thirty six percent in the last year. Main comaneys in japan have started to ban animal testing yet they test on monkeys such as the Japanese mocaque. They immobalize monkeys in their cages to detect neurolgical activity. Immbalizing animals in cages by locing thier head in a head restraint.
By 2013 they are hoping animal testing will have stopped in all major testing facilitys in japan. Unlike in the United States animal testing is still going and more poor animals suffring and dying everyday on the year.
Alternative testing on animals could save more animals especially people if we test on human cells instead of animals. the human body has more diseases even if animals can contract the same disease as humans the medice may only help animals and not humans.
Animal testing may cure the diseses they get but mast animals cant get certian diseases. the medicne can and may be fatel to humans yet may helpful to animal cures. The human cell is more complexed than animals even if the Gentic make up is the same and they have the same organs as humas.
The use of animal parts such as pig hearts work as heart transplants. human body reject cures of organs from other animls if the body thinks it under atacke. Killing the human who as either used a toxic medicne or the body rejecting an animal organ.
The killing of both animals and humans seem to be fatel to human and animals know matter if the medicine or organ is toxic for the human.

Coner, Steve. "Animal testing hits 20-year high". The Independent (Londan, England). 22 Jul 2009:19. SIRs Reaserch. Web. 17 Jan 2011.

Reaeven, Pir. "Animal Experimintation is nessisary to insure prouduct saftey". Ed. Cindy Mur. Sandiego: Greenhaven. 2009. At Issue Gale Opposing viewpoints in context. Web. 21 Jan 2011

Thomas, Pat "Animal Experimintaion".Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press. 2009. At Issue Gale Oppsing Viewpoints in context. Web. 14 Jan, 2011.

Croutia, Animal Friends. "Animal Experimintation is not Ethical". Animal Experimintation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press. 2009. At Issue Gale Opposing Viewpoints in context. Web. 21 Jan 2011